data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82297/82297f716c8310ff366cbc7f7ba8cea608955151" alt="Egmont Institute logo"
Is the EMU ready for future shocks? An overview of available backstops
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/008e6/008e61e38dd80b8c9880882c3dadb0d4c7ceda03" alt="Post thumbnail print"
In recent years much has been accomplished to make the EMU more resilient to banking crises, sovereign-debt crises or balance-of-payment crises. Several ‘backstops’ or financial safety nets were progressively put in place to absorb the shocks that could have otherwise broken the EMU as a system. These substantial advances reflected a gradual, trial-and-error approach rather than a grand design that would have completely overhauled the EMU architecture. While flexibility and realism have advantages, complacency is a clear risk. With no roadmap to follow, efforts to complete the architecture of the EMU may fade with time. Maintaining a sense of direction is crucial while potential vulnerabilities remain.
(Photo credit: Rétrofuturs (Hulk4598) / Stéphane Massa-Bidal, Flickr)